Signet Jewelers' American subsidiary Sterling Jewelers became the subject of one of the largest gender-discrimination disputes in the modern jewelry-retail industry. A class action launched in 2008 accused the company of discriminating against female employees, and the litigation ultimately involved approximately 44,000 current and former workers. The allegations brought scrutiny to the internal culture of a corporation operating some of America's most recognizable jewelry chains, including Kay Jewelers and Jared—the Galleria of Jewelry. In May 2017, Sterling settled a separate federal civil lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, while the broader employee class action continued toward a scheduled 2018 trial. Although a settlement is not an admission of every allegation, the scale of the case exposed how the polished, wedding-focused image of a major jewelry retailer could coexist with claims of unequal treatment inside its own workforce. The dispute became a significant reputational and legal burden for Signet as it attempted to present itself as a modern international retailer.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s-2010s
The 44,000-Woman Discrimination Fight Inside Sterling Jewelers
Sterling Jewelers, Signet Jewelers, Kay Jewelers, and Jared / 2000s-2010s
Signet Jewelers' American subsidiary Sterling Jewelers became the subject of one of the largest gender-discrimination disputes in the modern jewelry-retail industry. A class action launched in 2008 accused the company of discriminating against female employees, and the litigation ultimately involved approximately 44,000 current and former workers. The allegations brought scrutiny to the internal culture of a corporation operating some of America's most recognizable jewelry chains, including Kay Jewelers and Jared—the Galleria of Jewelry. In May 2017, Sterling settled a separate federal civil lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, while the broader employee class action continued toward a scheduled 2018 trial. Although a settlement is not an admission of every allegation, the scale of the case exposed how the polished, wedding-focused image of a major jewelry retailer could coexist with claims of unequal treatment inside its own workforce. The dispute became a significant reputational and legal burden for Signet as it attempted to present itself as a modern international retailer.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.