An investigation by Mediapart and the European Investigative Collaborations network alleged that Yves Saint Laurent used an offshore structure organized by its parent company, Kering, to shift profits away from France. Between 2009 and 2017, approximately €550 million in profits were reportedly transferred to Luxury Goods International, a Kering subsidiary based in Switzerland's canton of Ticino, where the profits were taxed at roughly 8 percent rather than France's much higher corporate rate of about 33 percent. The arrangement allegedly left Saint Laurent reporting only around €7 million in cumulative French profits between 2009 and 2016, producing approximately €430,000 in French tax, while journalists estimated that the French state lost roughly €180 million in tax revenue. The case became a vivid example of the contradiction at the heart of luxury fashion: a brand selling Parisian heritage and French couture mythology while its corporate profits were reportedly routed through a low-tax Swiss jurisdiction. The reporting described an aggressive tax-optimization system rather than a proven criminal conviction, making the affair part of the broader European debate over multinational luxury groups, intellectual accounting, and whether national tax systems can meaningfully capture profits generated by global retail networks.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s-2010s
The €180 Million Swiss Tax Escape Route Behind Saint Laurent's Luxury Profits
Yves Saint Laurent and Kering / 2000s-2010s
An investigation by Mediapart and the European Investigative Collaborations network alleged that Yves Saint Laurent used an offshore structure organized by its parent company, Kering, to shift profits away from France. Between 2009 and 2017, approximately €550 million in profits were reportedly transferred to Luxury Goods International, a Kering subsidiary based in Switzerland's canton of Ticino, where the profits were taxed at roughly 8 percent rather than France's much higher corporate rate of about 33 percent. The arrangement allegedly left Saint Laurent reporting only around €7 million in cumulative French profits between 2009 and 2016, producing approximately €430,000 in French tax, while journalists estimated that the French state lost roughly €180 million in tax revenue. The case became a vivid example of the contradiction at the heart of luxury fashion: a brand selling Parisian heritage and French couture mythology while its corporate profits were reportedly routed through a low-tax Swiss jurisdiction. The reporting described an aggressive tax-optimization system rather than a proven criminal conviction, making the affair part of the broader European debate over multinational luxury groups, intellectual accounting, and whether national tax systems can meaningfully capture profits generated by global retail networks.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.