In 2023, Melbourne Fashion Festival faced public criticism after presenting garments by the label Not A Man's Dream that carried the Arabic phrase “Allah walk with me.” The controversy centered not only on the use of Islamic religious language in a fashion context, but also on the garments’ sheer, transparent construction, which critics viewed as an especially disrespectful setting for sacred text. The Australian National Imams Council condemned the presentation, arguing that the display treated religious wording as a provocative design element rather than as a phrase deserving cultural and spiritual sensitivity. The incident placed the festival’s consumer-friendly celebration of Australian fashion in conflict with questions of religious representation, cultural consultation, and the limits of fashion provocation. Melbourne Fashion Festival subsequently issued an apology, acknowledged the offence caused, and removed Not A Man's Dream from the programme. The episode became a cautionary example of how an established public fashion event can suffer reputational damage when designers or organisers use sacred language without adequately considering its religious significance and presentation context.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2020s
The 2023 Melbourne Fashion Festival ‘Allah Walk With Me’ Runway Controversy
Not A Man's Dream and Melbourne Fashion Festival / 2020s
In 2023, Melbourne Fashion Festival faced public criticism after presenting garments by the label Not A Man's Dream that carried the Arabic phrase “Allah walk with me.” The controversy centered not only on the use of Islamic religious language in a fashion context, but also on the garments’ sheer, transparent construction, which critics viewed as an especially disrespectful setting for sacred text. The Australian National Imams Council condemned the presentation, arguing that the display treated religious wording as a provocative design element rather than as a phrase deserving cultural and spiritual sensitivity. The incident placed the festival’s consumer-friendly celebration of Australian fashion in conflict with questions of religious representation, cultural consultation, and the limits of fashion provocation. Melbourne Fashion Festival subsequently issued an apology, acknowledged the offence caused, and removed Not A Man's Dream from the programme. The episode became a cautionary example of how an established public fashion event can suffer reputational damage when designers or organisers use sacred language without adequately considering its religious significance and presentation context.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
