A 2002 Vanity Fair article by A. E. Hotchner alleged that film director Roman Polanski had made sexual advances toward a Norwegian model while traveling to the funeral of his murdered wife, Sharon Tate. The article attributed a crucial anecdote to Lewis H. Lapham: at Elaine's restaurant in New York in August 1969, Polanski supposedly boasted that he could make the model the "next Sharon Tate." Polanski sued in Britain, and the 2005 High Court trial exposed a fatal problem in the story's chronology. Evidence established that he had not dined at Elaine's until three weeks after the date given, and the Norwegian former model disputed important details. Mia Farrow and other witnesses testified, while Polanski—then living in France as a fugitive from U.S. law enforcement—gave evidence by video link, an unprecedented arrangement in English legal history. The court ruled that the reported scene had not occurred as described and awarded Polanski damages. The case became a major warning about the hazards of repeating celebrity sexual-misconduct anecdotes without independently verifying dates, witnesses, and sourcing, even in a publication celebrated for investigative journalism.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s
The False Elaine's Story: Roman Polanski's 2005 Libel Victory Over Vanity Fair
Vanity Fair, Roman Polanski, and A. E. Hotchner / 2000s
A 2002 Vanity Fair article by A. E. Hotchner alleged that film director Roman Polanski had made sexual advances toward a Norwegian model while traveling to the funeral of his murdered wife, Sharon Tate. The article attributed a crucial anecdote to Lewis H. Lapham: at Elaine's restaurant in New York in August 1969, Polanski supposedly boasted that he could make the model the "next Sharon Tate." Polanski sued in Britain, and the 2005 High Court trial exposed a fatal problem in the story's chronology. Evidence established that he had not dined at Elaine's until three weeks after the date given, and the Norwegian former model disputed important details. Mia Farrow and other witnesses testified, while Polanski—then living in France as a fugitive from U.S. law enforcement—gave evidence by video link, an unprecedented arrangement in English legal history. The court ruled that the reported scene had not occurred as described and awarded Polanski damages. The case became a major warning about the hazards of repeating celebrity sexual-misconduct anecdotes without independently verifying dates, witnesses, and sourcing, even in a publication celebrated for investigative journalism.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
