South Africa's garment industry became a battleground over both workplace power and racial segregation. Founded in 1909 as the Witwatersrand Tailors' Association, the organization initially represented white master tailors and middlemen, but in 1925 it created a section for factory workers and rapidly expanded its reach. By the end of 1926, it claimed 90 percent of clothing-factory workers in the Witwatersrand region and had begun admitting coloured and Indian workers. In 1928, general secretary Solly Sachs intensified recruitment among women garment workers and cooperated with the African Clothing Workers' Union, helping transform the organization from a craft association into a mass industrial union. Its 1929 constitutional changes led to the 1930 adoption of the name Garment Workers' Union, while the 1931 general strike exposed the financial and organizational pressures involved in challenging employers and the state.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1920s-1980s
Apartheid-Era Garment Unionism and the Government Ban on Solly Sachs
Garment Workers' Union of South Africa (GWU) and Solly Sachs / 1920s-1980s
South Africa's garment industry became a battleground over both workplace power and racial segregation. Founded in 1909 as the Witwatersrand Tailors' Association, the organization initially represented white master tailors and middlemen, but in 1925 it created a section for factory workers and rapidly expanded its reach. By the end of 1926, it claimed 90 percent of clothing-factory workers in the Witwatersrand region and had begun admitting coloured and Indian workers. In 1928, general secretary Solly Sachs intensified recruitment among women garment workers and cooperated with the African Clothing Workers' Union, helping transform the organization from a craft association into a mass industrial union. Its 1929 constitutional changes led to the 1930 adoption of the name Garment Workers' Union, while the 1931 general strike exposed the financial and organizational pressures involved in challenging employers and the state.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
