In 2002, Abercrombie & Fitch sold a shirt reading 'Wong Brothers Laundry Service — Two Wongs Can Make It White,' accompanied by smiling figures in conical hats. The design reduced Chinese immigrants and Chinese Americans to a racist caricature drawn from nineteenth-century American stereotypes. A boycott organized by a Stanford University Asian American student group forced the company to withdraw the shirt and apologize. The same year, Abercrombie removed a line of thong underwear marketed to young girls after parents organized nationwide protests. The underwear carried phrases such as 'Eye Candy' and 'Wink Wink,' making the episode an early flashpoint in the debate over the sexualization of children through mainstream retail. Together, the incidents revealed how the brand's pursuit of provocative humor treated racial identity and youthful sexuality as disposable advertising material, generating repeated public-relations crises and pressure for corporate accountability.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s
The 'Wong Brothers' Shirt and Abercrombie's Offensive T-Shirt Economy
Abercrombie & Fitch / 2000s
In 2002, Abercrombie & Fitch sold a shirt reading 'Wong Brothers Laundry Service — Two Wongs Can Make It White,' accompanied by smiling figures in conical hats. The design reduced Chinese immigrants and Chinese Americans to a racist caricature drawn from nineteenth-century American stereotypes. A boycott organized by a Stanford University Asian American student group forced the company to withdraw the shirt and apologize. The same year, Abercrombie removed a line of thong underwear marketed to young girls after parents organized nationwide protests. The underwear carried phrases such as 'Eye Candy' and 'Wink Wink,' making the episode an early flashpoint in the debate over the sexualization of children through mainstream retail. Together, the incidents revealed how the brand's pursuit of provocative humor treated racial identity and youthful sexuality as disposable advertising material, generating repeated public-relations crises and pressure for corporate accountability.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
