Behind the image.
Beneath the surface.

Darkside of Fashion

Fashion. Power.
The untold cost.

The Fashion archive Explore Darkside ↗

01 / More than meets the eye

Harvey Nichols Reverses Its Fur Ban After a Decade of Animal-Welfare Backlash

Harvey Nichols 2010s Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace Archive: verified 2/5 wildness

In September 2013, Harvey Nichols ended a decade-long embargo on fur and resumed selling fur garments in its United Kingdom stores. The reversal placed the luxury department-store chain in the middle of a growing confrontation between high-end fashion retailers and animal-rights campaigners, who argued that fur production involved unacceptable cruelty and that luxury brands had a responsibility to reject it. The decision was especially conspicuous because the company had previously operated under a ten-year no-fur policy, making the return appear to critics as a retreat from an ethical commitment rather than a neutral merchandising change. Harvey Nichols denied allegations that the products involved cruelty and maintained that its fur was ethically sourced from reputable suppliers. The controversy nevertheless demonstrated how quickly a luxury retailer's sourcing policies could become a reputational liability, particularly as public scrutiny of animal treatment, traceability, and the moral authority of fashion houses intensified during the 2010s.

Follow the sources:

← Back to Fashion Archive

02 / The daily darkside

A new perspective, every day.
Harvey Nichols Reverses Its Fur Ban After a Decade of Animal-Welfare BacklashAI concept artwork

Archive Record · 2010s

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace2/5 wildness

Harvey Nichols Reverses Its Fur Ban After a Decade of Animal-Welfare Backlash

Harvey Nichols / 2010s

In September 2013, Harvey Nichols ended a decade-long embargo on fur and resumed selling fur garments in its United Kingdom stores. The reversal placed the luxury department-store chain in the middle of a growing confrontation between high-end fashion retailers and animal-rights campaigners, who argued that fur production involved unacceptable cruelty and that luxury brands had a responsibility to reject it. The decision was especially conspicuous because the company had previously operated under a ten-year no-fur policy, making the return appear to critics as a retreat from an ethical commitment rather than a neutral merchandising change. Harvey Nichols denied allegations that the products involved cruelty and maintained that its fur was ethically sourced from reputable suppliers. The controversy nevertheless demonstrated how quickly a luxury retailer's sourcing policies could become a reputational liability, particularly as public scrutiny of animal treatment, traceability, and the moral authority of fashion houses intensified during the 2010s.

Archive: verified

03 / The fashion archive

More Stories from the Fashion Archive

Follow a name. Trace a thread.
Look a little closer.

1506 stories

1506 stories in this selection.

01

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace2020s

The Pierre Cardin License Cartel: Ahlers Fined for Shielding Its Menswear Monopoly Across Europe

Ahlers AG and Pierre Cardin

In 2024, the European Commission imposed a combined fine of €5.7 million on Ahlers and Pierre Cardin over anticompetitive agreements dating from 2008 to 2011. According to the Commission’s findings, the arrangements were designed to protect Ahlers from competition in European countries where it held a Pierre Cardin license. Rather than allowing licensed Pierre Cardin clothing to circulate freely throughout the European market, the agreements allegedly restricted cross-border sales and helped preserve Ahlers’ privileged position in selected territories. The penalty arrived as Ahlers was already in severe financial decline: the company filed for insolvency in April 2023, and the Röther Group subsequently acquired the Pierre Cardin, Baldessarini, Pioneer Jeans, and Pionier workwear brands while closing Ahlers’ stores and online shops and eliminating around 300 jobs. The fine therefore became part of a broader collapse narrative in which a once-listed German menswear group faced both regulatory condemnation over market shielding and the dismantling of its traditional retail empire.

Archive: verified ↗
02

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace2020s

Esprit's 2024 European Collapse: A Once-Billion-Dollar Brand Enters a Chain of Bankruptcies

Esprit Holdings

Esprit, the lifestyle label founded in 1968 by Susie and Doug Tompkins and once valued at more than US$20 billion, suffered a dramatic reversal after years of declining market share and losses following the 2008 financial crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the retreat: stores were gradually closed across China, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Macau, while the company attempted a cautious revival under CEO William Pak. Although Esprit reported a $48.5 million profit on $1 billion in revenue in 2022 and pursued a renewed New York presence in 2023, the recovery did not stabilize its European operations. The Swiss franchise filed for bankruptcy in March 2024, the Belgian franchise followed in April with the expected closure of 15 company-operated stores and the loss of 148 jobs, and Esprit's European operations entered administration for the second time in four years in May, affecting approximately 1,500 employees. Danish operations filed for bankruptcy in June, the Dutch unit collapsed in July, and the U.S. business filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in October 2024. The sequence exposed the vulnerability of a once-globally prominent fashion label whose expansion, retail overhead, and fractured regional structure could not withstand prolonged changes in consumer behavior and the post-pandemic retail environment.

Archive: verified ↗
03

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace1560s

The Satyr-Tailed Masque and the Night Bastian Pagez Became Linked to Darnley's Murder

Bastian Pagez, Mary, Queen of Scots, and the Scottish Court

Bastian Pagez's courtly prestige became entangled with one of the darkest episodes in Tudor-Stuart political history. On 9 February 1567, Mary, Queen of Scots attended a banquet and wedding masque for Bastian and Christily Hogg. She had given Christily black satin for her marriage gown the previous day, and contemporary accounts described the queen joining the dance and participating in the custom of putting the bride to bed. According to later reports, Mary may have worn male clothing during such masked entertainments, reinforcing the enduring image of a torchlit, disguise-filled court moving through Edinburgh on the eve of Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley's murder at Kirk o' Field.

Archive: verified ↗
04

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace2010s

LUXE.TV’s 2010 Collapse: A Luxury Broadcaster Loses Its Workforce and Goes to Bankruptcy Court

LUXE.TV / DVL.TV S.A.

LUXE.TV, the Luxembourg-based broadcaster devoted to fashion, jewelry, watches, travel, and other luxury industries, suffered a dramatic financial breakdown after Russian businessman Sergey Pugachyov’s holding company, OPK Luxadvor S.A., acquired a 72% controlling stake in April 2009. The takeover did not produce the expected turnaround. In early August 2010, 24 of the channel’s 37 employees—nearly two-thirds of its workforce—were dismissed, while all production activity was halted. Luxembourg’s OGBL trade-union confederation was informed that the channel’s business model had failed, exposing the sharp contrast between LUXE.TV’s polished image of elite consumption and the precarious reality inside the company.

Archive: verified ↗
05

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace1960s

The Mod Rebrand That Collapsed: The High Numbers Abandon Their First Single and Become The Who

The High Numbers / The Who

The High Numbers experiment failed commercially: "Zoot Suit" / "I'm the Face" did not chart, and the band's attempt to present itself as a tightly manufactured mod act quickly lost momentum. The group changed its name back to The Who, replaced Peter Meaden with new management, and moved toward original material. That strategic reversal produced "I Can't Explain," which became a United Kingdom Top Ten hit and helped establish the band on its own terms. The episode is a compact example of the music industry's version of a fashion-house rebrand: an image-driven launch built around borrowed cultural signals and uncredited musical sources gave way to a more durable identity once the packaging failed. The songs survived through later archival releases, including the 1974 Odds & Sods compilation and the 1979 Quadrophenia film soundtrack, but the original High Numbers concept became a discarded commercial persona rather than the band's lasting brand.

Archive: verified ↗
06

Designer Scandals & Falls from Grace2020s

From Contract Dispute to Corporate Exile: Gap Abandons Yeezy Products After West’s Antisemitic Remarks

Kanye West, Yeezy Gap, Gap Inc., and Balenciaga

The Yeezy Gap partnership finally collapsed in the midst of Kanye West’s 2022 public meltdown. After months of disputes over store openings, product control, executive meetings, and alleged design copying, Gap had initially indicated that it would continue working through the remaining Yeezy product pipeline. That position changed after West made a series of antisemitic public remarks in October 2022. On October 25, Gap announced that it would stop selling Yeezy Gap merchandise and abandoned its earlier plan to clear the remaining inventory after the contract ended. The decision followed similar corporate distancing across the fashion and entertainment industries and effectively ended a collaboration that had begun with a major stock-market surge and the promise of accessible, mass-market Yeezy design. West had also expanded the project into the Yeezy Gap Engineered by Balenciaga line in 2022, making the collapse particularly damaging to the commercial credibility of the venture and to the participating brands.

Archive: verified ↗
Showing 1–6 of 1506

An image is only part of the story. Status labels come from the archive; follow the sources and distinguish documented accounts, allegations, and folklore.

04 / For readers & creators

Give the story
another audience.

A daily editorial for your website.
An archive worth exploring.

01 / THE EMBEDEmbed the daily editorial.

Add the existing Fashion daily widget to your website. Its artwork and story follow the daily selection.

Widget instructions ↗
02 / THE APIExplore the archive API.

Find stories by keyword, designer or brand, category, myth status, and wildness. Start with a simple request.

Read the API guide ↗

In the guide, choose the REST API tab for endpoints and filters.

From the Fashion archive

Harvey Nichols / 2010s

Harvey Nichols Reverses Its Fur Ban After a Decade of Animal-Welfare Backlash

Designer Scandals & Falls from GraceArchive: verified2/5 wildness

In September 2013, Harvey Nichols ended a decade-long embargo on fur and resumed selling fur garments in its United Kingdom stores. The reversal placed the luxury department-store chain in the middle of a growing confrontation between high-end fashion retailers and animal-rights campaigners, who argued that fur production involved unacceptable cruelty and that luxury brands had a responsibility to reject it. The decision was especially conspicuous because the company had previously operated under a ten-year no-fur policy, making the return appear to critics as a retreat from an ethical commitment rather than a neutral merchandising change. Harvey Nichols denied allegations that the products involved cruelty and maintained that its fur was ethically sourced from reputable suppliers. The controversy nevertheless demonstrated how quickly a luxury retailer's sourcing policies could become a reputational liability, particularly as public scrutiny of animal treatment, traceability, and the moral authority of fashion houses intensified during the 2010s.

Follow the sources

Status and citations are supplied by the archive. AI concept art is an interpretation, not historical evidence.