Beginning in 2008, Goldaş became embroiled in a series of major disputes with international banks over gold consignments and unpaid obligations. In March 2008, Société Générale sued the Turkish jewellery company, alleging that Goldaş had failed to return a large consignment of gold. In September 2009, Bank of Nova Scotia and Commerzbank brought separate claims seeking approximately US$10.9 million and US$11.1 million. The litigation culminated in April 2013, when Istanbul’s Bakırköy Commercial Court of First Instance ruled in Commerzbank’s favor and moved to force Goldaş into bankruptcy. Goldaş announced that it would appeal and continued its legal battle with Bank of Nova Scotia in another Istanbul court. Later in 2013, Turkey’s High Court of Appeals effectively reversed the lower-court bankruptcy judgment after accepting Goldaş’s request that the matter first be adjudicated under British law rather than immediately subjected to Turkish bankruptcy law. The episode transformed a celebrated growth story into a tangled cross-border financial and legal collapse, although the source does not establish that the company committed criminal fraud.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s–2010s
The Missing Gold Allegations and Goldaş’s International Banking Wars
Goldaş Jewellery / 2000s–2010s
Beginning in 2008, Goldaş became embroiled in a series of major disputes with international banks over gold consignments and unpaid obligations. In March 2008, Société Générale sued the Turkish jewellery company, alleging that Goldaş had failed to return a large consignment of gold. In September 2009, Bank of Nova Scotia and Commerzbank brought separate claims seeking approximately US$10.9 million and US$11.1 million. The litigation culminated in April 2013, when Istanbul’s Bakırköy Commercial Court of First Instance ruled in Commerzbank’s favor and moved to force Goldaş into bankruptcy. Goldaş announced that it would appeal and continued its legal battle with Bank of Nova Scotia in another Istanbul court. Later in 2013, Turkey’s High Court of Appeals effectively reversed the lower-court bankruptcy judgment after accepting Goldaş’s request that the matter first be adjudicated under British law rather than immediately subjected to Turkish bankruptcy law. The episode transformed a celebrated growth story into a tangled cross-border financial and legal collapse, although the source does not establish that the company committed criminal fraud.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
