In February 2017, The Guardian reported that children were making H&M products in Myanmar for approximately 13 pence, or about 15 U.S. cents, per hour—roughly half the country's full legal minimum wage according to the report. The allegations placed a highly profitable global retailer's branding alongside the most vulnerable end of garment production: underage workers, legally inadequate pay, and factories operating in a country where enforcement was weak. The case became part of the broader argument that fast-fashion companies could publish supplier lists and sustainability programs while still failing to prevent abusive labor conditions deep in their contracting chains. After Myanmar's 2021 military coup, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre documented 156 worker-abuse allegations across the country's garment sector; H&M said it was investigating 20 cases involving its suppliers, while critics argued that monitoring was insufficient.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
Child Workers Paid Fifteen Cents an Hour in H&M's Myanmar Supply Chain
H&M and Myanmar garment suppliers / 2010s
In February 2017, The Guardian reported that children were making H&M products in Myanmar for approximately 13 pence, or about 15 U.S. cents, per hour—roughly half the country's full legal minimum wage according to the report. The allegations placed a highly profitable global retailer's branding alongside the most vulnerable end of garment production: underage workers, legally inadequate pay, and factories operating in a country where enforcement was weak. The case became part of the broader argument that fast-fashion companies could publish supplier lists and sustainability programs while still failing to prevent abusive labor conditions deep in their contracting chains. After Myanmar's 2021 military coup, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre documented 156 worker-abuse allegations across the country's garment sector; H&M said it was investigating 20 cases involving its suppliers, while critics argued that monitoring was insufficient.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
