Allbirds built its identity around the idea that a sneaker company could be both fashionable and environmentally virtuous, selling merino-wool shoes and plant-based materials as an antidote to petroleum-heavy footwear. That promise became increasingly difficult to sustain as the company prepared to go public. In the month before its November 3, 2021 Nasdaq listing, the company reportedly cut its references to sustainability principles and objectives by half, and removed language describing itself as the first "sustainable" IPO after pressure from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Allbirds also reported a $25.9 million loss against $219 million in revenue in the preceding year, with co-founder Joey Zwillinger defending the losses as the cost of building a sustainable business model. Legal scholars and environmental critics later accused the company of greenwashing, particularly over claims involving carbon offsets; a related case was dismissed, although the dismissal did not erase the broader criticism of its marketing claims.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2020s
Allbirds' Sustainable IPO Retreat and the Collapse of Silicon Valley's Favorite Sneaker Brand
Allbirds, Tim Brown, and Joey Zwillinger / 2020s
Allbirds built its identity around the idea that a sneaker company could be both fashionable and environmentally virtuous, selling merino-wool shoes and plant-based materials as an antidote to petroleum-heavy footwear. That promise became increasingly difficult to sustain as the company prepared to go public. In the month before its November 3, 2021 Nasdaq listing, the company reportedly cut its references to sustainability principles and objectives by half, and removed language describing itself as the first "sustainable" IPO after pressure from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Allbirds also reported a $25.9 million loss against $219 million in revenue in the preceding year, with co-founder Joey Zwillinger defending the losses as the cost of building a sustainable business model. Legal scholars and environmental critics later accused the company of greenwashing, particularly over claims involving carbon offsets; a related case was dismissed, although the dismissal did not erase the broader criticism of its marketing claims.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
