On 10 July 1959 a nitrate film fire ripped through part of the Cinémathèque Française's holdings — a catastrophic event for a collection that had ballooned from a mere ten films in 1936 to tens of thousands by the late 1950s. Henri Langlois, the charismatic and eccentric founder and director, had long been criticized for an almost romantic, non‑scientific approach to archiving: loose cataloguing, mixed storage, and an aversion to the bureaucratic paperwork prized by institutional archivists. Sources are in conflict about both the precise cause of the blaze and the full extent of what was lost, and the uncertainty only deepened Langlois's reputation as a brilliant savior of cinema who also flirted dangerously with neglect. The fire became a touchstone in debates across Europe about nitrate safety, proper film preservation, and whether passion alone could substitute for professional conservation practices — and it fed directly into later disciplinary collisions between Langlois and the archival establishment.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1950s
The Mysterious 10 July 1959 Nitrate Fire That Devastated Part of the Cinémathèque
Henri Langlois / Cinémathèque Française / 1950s
On 10 July 1959 a nitrate film fire ripped through part of the Cinémathèque Française's holdings — a catastrophic event for a collection that had ballooned from a mere ten films in 1936 to tens of thousands by the late 1950s. Henri Langlois, the charismatic and eccentric founder and director, had long been criticized for an almost romantic, non‑scientific approach to archiving: loose cataloguing, mixed storage, and an aversion to the bureaucratic paperwork prized by institutional archivists. Sources are in conflict about both the precise cause of the blaze and the full extent of what was lost, and the uncertainty only deepened Langlois's reputation as a brilliant savior of cinema who also flirted dangerously with neglect. The fire became a touchstone in debates across Europe about nitrate safety, proper film preservation, and whether passion alone could substitute for professional conservation practices — and it fed directly into later disciplinary collisions between Langlois and the archival establishment.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.