The sharpest dispute surrounding A Boy and His Dog was not between its actors but between author Harlan Ellison and director L.Q. Jones over the film’s ending. Ellison’s 1969 novella already presented a brutally cynical relationship between Vic and his telepathic dog, Blood, but Jones added the final locker-room-style quip about Quilla June having “marvelous judgment” but not particularly “good taste” after Vic murders her and feeds her body to Blood. Ellison later called the line a “moronic, hateful chauvinist last line” and said he preferred the more human and beguiling ending of his original story. He also objected to some of Blood’s dialogue when the dog first encounters Quilla June. The disagreement became part of the film’s legacy because the ending was simultaneously one of the movie’s most notorious shocks and one of the clearest examples of its perceived misogyny. Ellison could praise the adaptation overall—he reportedly told Jones after an early screening that it looked like the story he had imagined on screen—while still rejecting the extra material that turned the finale into a sexual joke. Feminist writer Joanna Russ also criticized the film in her essay “A Boy and His Dog: The Final Solution,” arguing that its treatment of women and sexual violence was central to its ideological problem rather than merely black comedy.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1970s
Harlan Ellison Disowned the Film’s Misogynistic Punch Line
A Boy and His Dog / 1970s
The sharpest dispute surrounding A Boy and His Dog was not between its actors but between author Harlan Ellison and director L.Q. Jones over the film’s ending. Ellison’s 1969 novella already presented a brutally cynical relationship between Vic and his telepathic dog, Blood, but Jones added the final locker-room-style quip about Quilla June having “marvelous judgment” but not particularly “good taste” after Vic murders her and feeds her body to Blood. Ellison later called the line a “moronic, hateful chauvinist last line” and said he preferred the more human and beguiling ending of his original story. He also objected to some of Blood’s dialogue when the dog first encounters Quilla June. The disagreement became part of the film’s legacy because the ending was simultaneously one of the movie’s most notorious shocks and one of the clearest examples of its perceived misogyny. Ellison could praise the adaptation overall—he reportedly told Jones after an early screening that it looked like the story he had imagined on screen—while still rejecting the extra material that turned the finale into a sexual joke. Feminist writer Joanna Russ also criticized the film in her essay “A Boy and His Dog: The Final Solution,” arguing that its treatment of women and sexual violence was central to its ideological problem rather than merely black comedy.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.