More than a decade after The Candidate won Jeremy Larner an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay (45th Academy Awards, 1973), the film unexpectedly re‑entered real American politics. During the 1988 presidential campaign, then‑vice‑presidential candidate Dan Quayle acknowledged having seen the film multiple times and said he modeled aspects of his own public persona on Robert Redford’s idealistic, image‑conscious Bill McKay. Larner — the former Eugene McCarthy speechwriter who had written the script in the summer of 1971 under intense time pressure — publicly bristled. He wrote an open letter to Quayle insisting the film was “not a how‑to picture, it’s a watch‑out picture,” and warned that McKay represented the very type of polished, vacuous politician voters should distrust. The exchange made for an odd cultural footnote: a movie that began as a quick, low‑budget political satire in 1972 had become part of the rhetorical arsenal in national campaigns, prompting coverage in political press and reaffirming Larner’s intent that the film was a cautionary tale rather than a playbook for ambition. The incident underlined The Candidate’s strange afterlife — from art house satire to inadvertent political influence — and the irritation filmmakers often feel when fiction is taken as instruction by the real people they caricatured.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1980s
When Dan Quayle Said He Modeled Himself on Robert Redford’s Bill McKay — and the Oscar‑Winning Writer Fired Back
The Candidate (1972) / Jeremy Larner / Dan Quayle / 1980s
More than a decade after The Candidate won Jeremy Larner an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay (45th Academy Awards, 1973), the film unexpectedly re‑entered real American politics. During the 1988 presidential campaign, then‑vice‑presidential candidate Dan Quayle acknowledged having seen the film multiple times and said he modeled aspects of his own public persona on Robert Redford’s idealistic, image‑conscious Bill McKay. Larner — the former Eugene McCarthy speechwriter who had written the script in the summer of 1971 under intense time pressure — publicly bristled. He wrote an open letter to Quayle insisting the film was “not a how‑to picture, it’s a watch‑out picture,” and warned that McKay represented the very type of polished, vacuous politician voters should distrust. The exchange made for an odd cultural footnote: a movie that began as a quick, low‑budget political satire in 1972 had become part of the rhetorical arsenal in national campaigns, prompting coverage in political press and reaffirming Larner’s intent that the film was a cautionary tale rather than a playbook for ambition. The incident underlined The Candidate’s strange afterlife — from art house satire to inadvertent political influence — and the irritation filmmakers often feel when fiction is taken as instruction by the real people they caricatured.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.