When John Trent's 1970 drama Homer — shot in Canada, directed by a Canadian, but financed by an American studio and set in small‑town Wisconsin — was submitted to the 22nd Canadian Film Awards it touched a raw nerve in a still‑nascent national cinema. The entry itself became the story: critics and delegates argued whether a picture should be judged by the nationality of its director and shooting locations or by who wrote the cheques and what story it told. The controversy was widely noted at the time; contemporary coverage recorded that Homer’s inclusion in competition was contested precisely because it sat awkwardly between national categories. The film’s credits underscore the ambiguity that fueled the dispute — Canadian director John Trent and Canadian production resources on one side, an American financing structure and clearly American narrative content on the other — while reviews singled out performances (a Village Voice piece oddly highlighted Tim Henry’s “miraculous” turn) and criticized the film’s aesthetics, leaving the production itself framed by questions of cultural authorship rather than purely by cinema artistry.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1970s
The 1970 Canadian Film Awards Row: Was Homer Really 'Canadian'?
Homer (1970), dir. John Trent / 1970s
When John Trent's 1970 drama Homer — shot in Canada, directed by a Canadian, but financed by an American studio and set in small‑town Wisconsin — was submitted to the 22nd Canadian Film Awards it touched a raw nerve in a still‑nascent national cinema. The entry itself became the story: critics and delegates argued whether a picture should be judged by the nationality of its director and shooting locations or by who wrote the cheques and what story it told. The controversy was widely noted at the time; contemporary coverage recorded that Homer’s inclusion in competition was contested precisely because it sat awkwardly between national categories. The film’s credits underscore the ambiguity that fueled the dispute — Canadian director John Trent and Canadian production resources on one side, an American financing structure and clearly American narrative content on the other — while reviews singled out performances (a Village Voice piece oddly highlighted Tim Henry’s “miraculous” turn) and criticized the film’s aesthetics, leaving the production itself framed by questions of cultural authorship rather than purely by cinema artistry.
The daily feature is taking an intermission. There’s still an entire archive to explore.